Ecad

So, you must have optimised the schematic, chosen the right components, and even double-checked stack-up rules. But when the board hits EMI testing, it fails. Now, this is often the result of subtle PCB layout mistakes causing radiated emissions—issues that don’t show up in design reviews but quickly surface in the compliance lab. In high-speed

Now, your design passed ERC and DRC with no error! Likewise, the layout looked clean, and the nets checked out fine. Yet when the board went for fabrication, it failed the DFM in the PCB design stage. Why? Because ERC and DRC only validate electrical rules inside the ECAD tool. They don’t account for how

So, apparently, you must have run all the simulations, where everything looks stable, and the margins seem completely  safe. But when the board comes back from fabrication, the measurements don’t match the models. This kind of PDN design failure after simulation is one of the most common and frustrating issues engineers face. Now, on paper,

As we all know, it goes without saying that switching ECAD platforms is never as simple as clicking “export” and “import.” Yes, If you’ve ever tried migrating a project from one tool to another, you are well familiar with the risk of data slipping through the cracks. On the other hand, symbols lose pin mappings,

So, you have double-checked your design, right? Likewise, the schematic is clean, ERC passed, and you are feeling confident. But when you push the design to layout, the problem hits significant: As a result nothing fits. Now, this dreaded PCB layout doesn’t match schematic problem and it’s apparently more common than you think. Engineers worldwide

Nearly 70% of new PCB designs fail in their very first manufacturing run. Yes, engineers invest weeks of effort into schematics and layouts but only to watch the first prototypes come back with issues like: Short circuits Open enclosures  Assembly issues, or signal problems And while people often blame complexity or tight deadlines, the real